Services

Advice, Testimony & Representaion

Services include legal advice, expert testimony, internal investigations and representation in financial regulatory enforcement matters, complex disputes, and matters at the frontier of technology and financial crime. Wherever the legal and financial fields come together.

Financial Regulatory

Regulatory enforcement & strategy

When financial supervisors or a public prosecutor opens an inquiry, the response defines the outcome. We advise on strategy, assess exposure, and where needed, conduct or validate internal investigations. We represent companies in administrative proceedings against authorities.

Compliance & preventive advisory

Financial regulatory, market abuse compliance, disclosure obligations, AML frameworks, pre-transaction advice, boardroom counseling, and in-house training for lawyers, compliance officers, and board members. The most valuable work is often the work that prevents a crisis.

Dispute Resolution

Complex disputes

Complex disputes in the financial markets rarely turn on law alone. Shareholder claims, market abuse, securities litigation, disclosure violations, accounting fraud allegations, and benchmark disputes require both legal precision and economic understanding. We act as counsel and lead investigations.

Expert opinions & witness testimony

We provide expert reports, opinions and testimony for courts and regulators across jurisdictions. Our opinions are built on deep expertise, both legal rigour and where needed economic analysis. Both companies and government agencies turn to us for advice.

White Collar Crime

Criminal & administrative defence

Market manipulation, insider trading, fraud, corruption, money laundering. Often criminal investigations go together with administrative and civil proceedings. That requires a smart strategic approach and an integrated understanding. We bring arguments built on a combination of legal analysis and economic data.

Emerging technology & crime

Neemley has a specific expertise in emerging technology and enforcement. Both in practice and in academia. Crypto crime, online fraud and  abuse of artificial intelligence. The instruments are new. The principles of crime and market integrity are not.

Track Record

Financial Regulatory

Advising listed companies on disclosure obligations

Counselled boards on market abuse matters

Advising on regulatory aspects of public bids and share buybacks

Senior expert on EU-wide review for the European Commission

Advising fintechs on licence requirements

Dispute Resolution

Expert witness in UK billion-dollar claim

Civil claims in relation to the Libor matter

Internal investigation in NL and UK on financial aspects of antitrust claims

Settlement between a listed company, VEB, and major shareholders

Disputes on behalf of a Swiss bank in relation to investments

White Collar Crime

Expert report for public prosecution on a corruption matter

Criminal complaint to prosecutors on behalf of a foreign corporation

Led internal investigation in three countries with up to 30 lawyers

Litigation against the AFM in three instances for listed companies

Boardroom counsellor in US oil futures manipulation matter

Reviewing Economic Damage

The number is never just a number

Economic damage claims are built on models, and models are built on assumptions. Whether we are examining a damage claim brought against a client, constructing one that needs to withstand serious challenge, or providing independent assessment before a court or arbitral tribunal, the work is the same: tracing the causal chain between conduct and loss, testing the counterfactual, and establishing whether the figure on the table reflects what the evidence actually supports. Legal frameworks define what is compensable. Economic analysis determines whether the claimed damage occurred and whether the number holds. The two cannot be separated, and in the matters where this question is live, the difference between a figure that holds and one that does not is rarely small.