Services

Practice & Precision

Some matters arrive with clear precedent and established procedure. Many do not. Our services cover the full lifecycle of enforcement, from the first sign of regulatory scrutiny through to expert testimony before a court or arbitral panel, and the work in between that shapes how a matter is framed before it is ever formally heard.

Financial Regulatory

Regulatory enforcement & strategy

When financial supervisors or a public prosecutor opens an inquiry, the response defines the outcome. We advise on enforcement strategy, assess exposure, and where needed, conduct or validate internal investigations before or alongside formal proceedings.

Compliance & preventive advisory

Disclosure obligations, AML frameworks, market abuse compliance, pre-transaction advice, board-level counsel, and in-house training for lawyers, compliance officers, and board members. The most valuable work is often the work that prevents a crisis.

Dispute Resolution

Complex disputes

Complex disputes in the financial markets rarely turn on law alone. Shareholder claims, securities litigation, accounting fraud allegations, and benchmark disputes require both legal precision and economic understanding. We act as counsel, lead investigations, and appear as expert witness.

Expert opinions & witness services

Expert reports and testimony for courts, regulators, and arbitration panels across jurisdictions. Our opinions withstand cross-examination because they are built on both legal rigour and economic analysis.

White Collar Crime

Criminal & administrative defence

Market manipulation, insider trading, fraud, corruption, money laundering. We bring arguments built on a combination of legal analysis and economic data. Criminal cases dropped, administrative matters won, civil disputes settled: the record reflects what this approach produces.

Emerging technology & financial crime

Matthijs has a specific expertise in emerging technology and enforcement. Crypto crime, online fraud, abuse of artificial intelligence, cross-border digital asset matters. The instruments are new. The principles of crime and market integrity are not.

Track Record

Financial Regulatory

Advising listed companies on disclosure obligations

Counselled boards on market abuse matters

Advising on regulatory aspects of public bids and share buybacks

Senior expert on EU-wide review for the European Commission

Advising fintechs on licence requirements

Dispute Resolution

Expert witness in UK billion-dollar claim

Civil claims in relation to the Libor matter

Internal investigation in NL and UK on financial aspects of antitrust claims

Settlement between a listed company, VEB, and major shareholders

Disputes on behalf of a Swiss bank in relation to investments

White Collar Crime

Expert report for public prosecution on a corruption matter

Criminal complaint to prosecutors on behalf of a foreign corporation

Led internal investigation in three countries with up to 30 lawyers

Litigation against the AFM in three instances for listed companies

Boardroom counsellor in US oil futures manipulation matter

Reviewing Economic Damage

The number is never just a number

Economic damage claims are built on models, and models are built on assumptions. Whether we are examining a damage claim brought against a client, constructing one that needs to withstand serious challenge, or providing independent assessment before a court or arbitral tribunal, the work is the same: tracing the causal chain between conduct and loss, testing the counterfactual, and establishing whether the figure on the table reflects what the evidence actually supports. Legal frameworks define what is compensable. Economic analysis determines whether the claimed damage occurred and whether the number holds. The two cannot be separated, and in the matters where this question is live, the difference between a figure that holds and one that does not is rarely small.